Business scope
Review cryptographic inventory evidence, data confidentiality lifetimes, platform dependencies and migration schedules. Build a scoped post-quantum readiness and crypto-agility plan with explicit interoperability, performance and recovery gates.
Roles and ownership
Security and cryptography architects, Infrastructure and platform owners, Application and integration teams, Risk and compliance reviewers, Procurement and supplier managers, Business data owners participate within delegated responsibilities. Customer-approved cryptographic inventory and asset records, Certificate, protocol and signing evidence, Key-management and hardware-security platform records, Supplier support statements and applicable policy records retain the records they own.
Action and confirmation
Each connected action needs the relevant source identity, approved scope, current revision, receiving system, and permitted state transition. A sent request is distinct from an accepted business outcome. Unknown outcomes require reconciliation before a consequential retry.
Authority boundaries
The current toolkit reviews declared inventory evidence and requirements. It does not automatically discover cryptographic assets, generate a verified CBOM, scan TLS endpoints or migrate customer systems.
Policy selection is an operator assertion requiring qualified applicability review. A planning comparison does not determine legal obligations or certify compliance.
Published algorithm and TLS examples do not establish the customer fleet’s compatibility, negotiated algorithms or performance overhead.
Cryptographic changes, key operations, trust changes and production release remain with the customer’s authorized security and platform owners.
Acceptance and measurement
Begin with a free initial assessment. Then select one application or platform population, review approved inventory evidence and confidentiality requirements, and produce an evidence-gap register, dependency map, migration sequence and target-environment acceptance plan. Paid delivery is agreed in a written proposal.
- Inventory evidence coverage
- Unresolved cryptographic dependencies
- Owned priority migration waves
- Schedule gaps against applicable targets
- Interoperability and negotiated-algorithm acceptance
- Measured handshake and signature impact
- Recovery and supplier-readiness evidence
Deployment-specific decisions
The engagement confirms source systems, access purpose, field mappings, identity, operating volumes, retention, recovery, and support responsibilities. These decisions become part of the agreed implementation and acceptance record.